WhoShapedIt EU Inc

EU Inc (the 28th regime) · 2026/0074(COD)

How Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für das Burgenland lobbied on EU Inc

Opposes
Other · AUT

Opposes the 28th regime proposal because it threatens workers' rights, enables harmful regime shopping, and weakens labour and insolvency protections.

1 submission to the Commission. Summaries are AI-written; the quotes are theirs, checked word for word.

What they asked for

  1. Who can use it?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Restrict the regime to innovative start-ups rather than allowing all companies, including existing groups, to use it for restructuring.

    “Contrary to the objective of promoting innovative start-ups, the regime is open to all companies and can be used to restructure existing groups.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  2. How fast can you set one up?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Prevent facilitation of non-transparent ownership structures and letterbox companies that hinder enforcement of labour, tax, and social legislation.

    “At the same time, it facilitates non-transparent ownership structures and the creation of letterbox companies. This would make it more difficult to control and enforce labour, tax and social legislation.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  3. How do shares and employee stock options work?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Ensure employee share ownership schemes provide real participation and information rights and protect value in insolvency, rather than just issuing warrants with limited rights and risks.

    “The planned employee share ownership (EU-ESO) is not an equivalent substitute for fair wages. The warrants issued do not confer any participation or information rights and may lose their full value in the event of insolvency. The envisaged minimum holding period of 24 months further increases this risk.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  4. Do workers keep a say on the board?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Protect workers' rights and maintain strong employee participation and collective agreements to prevent weakening of national safeguards and circumvention of participation rights.

    “The Commission proposal poses a serious threat to workers and their rights... National safeguards are weakened, while differences between statutory and administrative headquarters could be used to circumvent existing participation rights. Collective agreements and employee participation would also become even less important as a result.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  5. Where can it be registered?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Prevent pan-European regime shopping that allows companies to choose legal systems with the lowest worker and social protection standards.

    “The possibility of pan-European regime shopping is particularly critical. Companies could specifically choose the legal system that imposes the least requirements on workers and social protection. This would encourage competition for lower standards.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  6. One EU law, or 27 national ones?

    Wants changes
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Use Article 352 TFEU as the legal basis requiring unanimity in the Council instead of Article 114 TFEU to ensure democratic legitimacy and subsidiarity.

    “The legal basis of the proposal is also questionable... On the basis of the principle of subsidiarity, Article 114 TFEU appears to be inappropriate. Instead, recourse should be had to Article 352 TFEU, which requires unanimity in the Council.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation
  7. What happens when it fails?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 23 Jun 2026

    Maintain strong national insolvency protections for creditors and employees, including independent insolvency administration to represent employees' interests.

    “Insolvency rules are also problematic. They weaken national protection standards for creditors and employees, as well as existing pay protection systems. The renunciation of independent insolvency administration, which could effectively represent employees’ interests, is particularly critical.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-23 · the Commission’s translation

Their submissions

See every lobby and how the EU Inc text changed →

Open source underneath

Built with

WhoShapedIt is a thin layer on open-source packages. Star them, fork them, build your own micro.

Contextrie

60

Open-source context and state for AI: it keeps only what matters for the question.

In WhoShapedIt: Reads every lobby submission and position paper and each official text, cut into passages, and judges each passage against nine questions (who can use EU Inc, workers on the board, tax…), so every ask and every step is read on the passages that address it.

feuersteiner/contextrie

Bref UI

27

Open-source Svelte components for clean, accessible interfaces.

In WhoShapedIt: The status, the timeline, the theme picker, the camps of lobbies and the organisation pages.

feuersteiner/bref-ui

Also built with SvelteKit · Vercel AI SDK · Zod