WhoShapedIt EU Inc

EU Inc (the 28th regime) · 2026/0074(COD)

How Arbeiterkammer Steiermark lobbied on EU Inc

Opposes
Other · AUT

Rejects the creation of a 28th company law regime as it would undermine labour protections and enable regulatory arbitrage.

1 submission to the Commission. Summaries are AI-written; the quotes are theirs, checked word for word.

What they asked for

  1. Who can use it?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 25 Jun 2026

    Do not allow companies to choose the lowest legal requirements across Member States, as this would undermine labour law and protective rules.

    “We firmly reject the idea of creating a company law system. This would allow companies to choose between the lowest legal requirements in the respective Member States, thereby deliberately circumventing labour law provisions as well as national protective rules.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-25 · the Commission’s translation
  2. How much capital, and who protects creditors?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 25 Jun 2026

    Require minimum equity capital to ensure liability limitation is not undermined and to protect against insolvency risks.

    “Similarly, the limitation of liability is undermined by a lack of minimum equity capital, which has far-reaching implications in the area of insolvency, and favours regime shopping through letterbox companies.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-25 · the Commission’s translation
  3. Do workers keep a say on the board?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 25 Jun 2026

    Protect employee participation rights and collective bargaining assurances, preventing their massive cuts.

    “There would also be massive cuts to employees’ participation rights and to collective bargaining assurances.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-25 · the Commission’s translation
  4. Where can it be registered?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 25 Jun 2026

    Prevent the disparity between registered office and administrative seat that allows elimination of employee participation rights and facilitates frivolous transactions.

    “We find it particularly problematic that the disparity between the registered office and the administrative seat makes it possible to deliberately eliminate established employee participation rights. In addition, the rapid creation of company seats in any Member State opens the door to frivolous transactions, for example due to the lack of an identification and notarial check when digitally established.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-25 · the Commission’s translation
  5. What about tax?

    Against
    Feedback on the proposal (2026) · 25 Jun 2026

    Ensure state controls in tax, social, and labour law are not hampered by abusive start-ups exploiting the new regime.

    “State controls in areas such as tax, social or labour law would be significantly hampered by abusive start-ups.”

    Feedback, 2026-06-25 · the Commission’s translation

Their submissions

See every lobby and how the EU Inc text changed →

Open source underneath

Built with

WhoShapedIt is a thin layer on open-source packages. Star them, fork them, build your own micro.

Contextrie

60

Open-source context and state for AI: it keeps only what matters for the question.

In WhoShapedIt: Reads every lobby submission and position paper and each official text, cut into passages, and judges each passage against nine questions (who can use EU Inc, workers on the board, tax…), so every ask and every step is read on the passages that address it.

feuersteiner/contextrie

Bref UI

27

Open-source Svelte components for clean, accessible interfaces.

In WhoShapedIt: The status, the timeline, the theme picker, the camps of lobbies and the organisation pages.

feuersteiner/bref-ui

Also built with SvelteKit · Vercel AI SDK · Zod