EU Inc (the 28th regime) · 2026/0074(COD)
Supports the EU Inc proposal as a step to strengthen European competitiveness but wants clarifications and amendments to limit residual national law and improve dispute resolution mechanisms.
Amend Article 60 to allow EU Inc companies, including listed ones, to seek admission of their shares to trading on multilateral trading facilities or regulated markets, subject to applicable Union and national law safeguards.
“Article 60 could therefore be amended to provide that Member States shall not prohibit an EU Inc from seeking admission of its shares to trading on a multilateral trading facility or a regulated market, provided that the applicable requirements under Union and national law are complied with, while preserving the possibility for Member States to regulate access to regulated markets in accordance with national frameworks and applicable Union law.”
Feedback, 2026-06-24
Clarify that the statutes of EU Inc may regulate or exclude the application of residual national law within the limits of Union and mandatory national law, by amending Article 4(2) accordingly.
“It would therefore be desirable to clarify expressly that the statutes may, within the limits imposed by mandatory provisions of Union and national law, regulate or exclude the application of residual national law. To that end, Article 4(2) could be amended to provide that matters not governed by this Regulation or by the statutes, unless otherwise provided therein within the limits permitted by this Regulation and by mandatory provisions of Union and national law, shall be governed by the national law applicable to the corresponding national corporate form in the Member State of the registered office.”
Feedback, 2026-06-24
Encourage measures to foster interpretative convergence among national courts, including allowing disputes in English and creating a European database of judgments.
“Allowing disputes relating to EU Inc to be conducted before national courts in English and establishing a European database of judgments would contribute to the development of a common body of case law.”
Feedback, 2026-06-24
Modernise the preliminary ruling mechanism under Article 267 TFEU to be faster, digitalised and more specialised to better serve modern market needs.
“Further modernisation of the preliminary ruling mechanism under Article 267 TFEU, through faster, digitalised and more specialised procedures, could better align judicial dialogue with the needs of modern markets.”
Feedback, 2026-06-24
Clarify that EU Inc may adopt institutional arbitration for internal disputes to promote specialised principles and their dissemination in anonymised English form.
“The Regulation could clarify the possibility for EU Inc to adopt institutional arbitration for disputes relating to the internal affairs of the company, thereby promoting the development of principles by highly specialised arbitrators and facilitating their dissemination, in anonymised form and in English.”
Feedback, 2026-06-24
Open source underneath
WhoShapedIt is a thin layer on open-source packages. Star them, fork them, build your own micro.
Open-source context and state for AI: it keeps only what matters for the question.
In WhoShapedIt: Reads every lobby submission and position paper and each official text, cut into passages, and judges each passage against nine questions (who can use EU Inc, workers on the board, tax…), so every ask and every step is read on the passages that address it.
Open-source Svelte components for clean, accessible interfaces.
In WhoShapedIt: The status, the timeline, the theme picker, the camps of lobbies and the organisation pages.
Also built with SvelteKit · Vercel AI SDK · Zod