WhoBuys Search

Method · data as of 2026-10-08

How buyers are ranked

Companies tend to buy what they have bought before. WhoBuys compares a company's website with 4,583 past acquisitions by 159 companies and shows the deals behind every name.

56%

of 1,583 real acquisitions since 2010 had the actual buyer in the top 5

30%

had it ranked first (chance: 0.6%)

159

buyers, 4,583 acquisitions from 1958 to 2026

The data

Wikipedia, in two ways. First, the per-company acquisition lists, which give one row per deal with a date and what the acquired company did: Google, Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Cisco, Oracle, IBM, Adobe, Intel, SAP, eBay, Accenture, Yahoo, Twitter (X), AOL, HP, Dell, Citrix, Gen Digital (Norton), GoDaddy, BlackBerry, Broadcom (CA), Juniper Networks, Nokia, Sony, Rakuten, Electronic Arts, Take-Two Interactive, Red Hat. Second, for buyers without a list (Stripe, Salesforce, PayPal, Uber, Shopify and others), the buyer's own article and the articles of companies "acquired by" it. Each acquired company's own Wikipedia introduction is added, so a precedent describes the business, and links to its source.

The matching

WhoBuys reads the company's homepage and a few linked pages, then compares what it does with every past acquisition by meaning: each description becomes an embedding (OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small), so "product analytics" and "user behaviour tracking" count as close even without a word in common. Buyer and brand names are removed first, so a match is about the business, not who's mentioned. For each buyer, its three closest past deals give a fit score; only similarity above a threshold counts, so hundreds of loosely related deals don't add up, and recent, well-described deals count more. Two adjustments follow: specificity (closer than the buyer's usual match, strength 0.5) and a prior for buyers that acquire often (strength 0.25), both chosen on the backtest among settings where the five busiest buyers fill at most 60% of shortlists. If the embedding service is unavailable, a word-based match (TF-IDF) with its own calibration takes over.

The backtest

Every acquisition since 2010 in the data is a test: we hide it (and any other record of the same company), describe the acquired company in words, rank buyers, and look for the real one.

Top 1Top 3Top 5
WhoBuys30%46%56%
Matching on shared words instead29%46%55%
Always the busiest buyers6%14%22%
Chance1%2%3%

Top 5 by kind of buyer: 57% when the buyer is one of the large acquirers with a full Wikipedia list, 56% for the others. The test describes companies with Wikipedia's words; a real website is wordier and more promotional, so expect live results to be somewhat weaker.

Examples it got (top 3): ASTER Technologies → Siemens (2026) · Exacom → Motorola Solutions (2026) · Bell Mobility → Motorola Solutions (2026) · Hyper → Motorola Solutions (2026) · D-Fend Solutions → Motorola Solutions (2026) · SpectraWAVE → Philips (2026) · Industry Ventures → Goldman Sachs (2026) · Innovator Capital → Goldman Sachs (2026)

The percentages

Each buyer's percentage answers: if one of the 159 buyers in our data acquires this company, how likely is it this one? Scores are turned into percentages with one curve fitted on the backtest, then checked: we grouped every percentage shown in the backtest and counted how often that buyer really was the acquirer. In 4% of past deals, the real buyer had no close precedent at all, so the percentages add up to 96%, not 100%.

ShownAverage shownActually the buyerCases
0–5%3%3%9,545
5–10%7%8%3,953
10–20%14%15%1,431
20–30%24%33%391
30–50%38%45%213
50–100%69%65%144

Low percentages are accurate; high ones are cautious (a buyer shown above 50% was the real one even more often). They say nothing about whether the company will be acquired at all: that depends on things no website shows.

Specialists

Big acquirers have bought a bit of everything, so they top many lists. Each company page also shows up to three specialists: buyers with at most 60 deals in our data that once bought a company very close to this one (the single closest past deal decides).

Limits

  • Who's in the data decides who can be named. Wikipedia documents large, public acquirers best. Many active buyers are missing or have only a few deals here, and the backtest only covers buyers in the data.
  • Fit is not intent. A company that bought something similar may not want another one, and nobody named is known to be interested.
  • Matching on words misses context: two companies can describe different businesses with the same words.
  • The buyer brief adds context from the company's own site and may name partners or competitors it mentions. Each quote is checked against its source.
  • A website that needs JavaScript or blocks automated visits can't be read; paste a description instead.

Not investment advice. WhoBuys is independent and not affiliated with any company named. Acquisition data from Wikipedia under CC BY-SA 4.0: Google, Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Cisco, Oracle, IBM, Adobe, Intel, SAP, eBay, Accenture, Yahoo, Twitter (X), AOL, HP, Dell, Citrix, Gen Digital (Norton), GoDaddy, BlackBerry, Broadcom (CA), Juniper Networks, Nokia, Sony, Rakuten, Electronic Arts, Take-Two Interactive, Red Hat and the articles linked from each deal.

Built with open source on GitHub

Lastware micros: small, useful tools on open-source packages.